Theft Crimes (Larceny, Larceny by trick, Embezzlement, False Pretenses)| PC 484 | PC 488

You are here: Home » Theft Crimes (Larceny, Larceny by trick, Embezzlement, False Pretenses)| PC 484 | PC 488


Under California Penal Code 484, every person can be found guilty of theft if he/she

  • feloniously steal, take, carry, lead, or drive away the personal property of another, OR
  • fraudulently appropriate property which has been entrusted to him or her, OR
  • knowingly and designedly, by any false or fraudulent representation or pretense, defraud any other person of money, labor or real or personal property, OR
  • causes or procures others to report falsely of his or her wealth or mercantile character and by thus imposing upon any person, obtains credit and thereby fraudulently gets or obtains possession of money, or property or obtains the labor or service of another.

Under PC 484, theft crimes are classified into four categories.

Theft by Larceny

A theft by larceny is defined by feloniously stealing, taking, carrying, leading, or driving away the personal property of another. In order to convict a defendant on this charge, the prosecutor will need to prove that 1. you took possession of another person’s property, 2. moving it however slightly, 3. with intent to steal (deprive permanently or for significant time of enjoyment of property), and 4. without owner’s consent.

Example. Larceny is what most people picture then they are told something has been stolen. It is simply taking someone else’s property. The defendant sees a bicycle outside the store, realizing that no one is watching the bicycle, he/she sits on it and rides away.  

Defenses. The property must be asported or carried away. If the property was never taken from the victim or never moved by the defendant, then the defendant cannot be found guilty of larceny. (The victim accidentally leaves an expensive watch at defendant’s apartment. The defendant does not take or move the property.) 

Theft by Embezzlement

Embezzlement is defined as fraudulently appropriating property which has been entrusted to the defendant. The prosecution will need to prove that 1. the property owner entrusted the property in you, 2. which you fraudulently converted or used for your own benefit, 3. with intent of depriving the true owner of the use and enjoyment.

Example. A cashier pockets the money without putting it in the cash register. He/she also does not enter the amount into the computer, so that the receipts match the amount in the drawer. 

Example. The church pastor asks a defendant to deposit cash into church’s bank account. The defendant takes the money and decides to purchase a new TV on the way home. 

Defenses. Permission is always a defense to embezzlement. If the previous example, the defendant calls the pastor and ask whether it would be fine to borrow the money as long as he deposits the same amount by the end of the week. The pastor, who has authority over the money, allows the defendant to borrow the money.

Theft by False Pretenses

Theft by False Pretenses is defined as knowingly and designedly, by any false or fraudulent representation or pretense, defraud any other person of money, labor or real or personal property. The prosecutor needs to prove that the defendant 1. knowingly deceived the property owner by fraudulent representation or pretense, 2. with intent to obtain title to the property, and the property owner 3. transferred ownership in reliance on the false representation.  

Example. A city employee working an hourly wage, punches his time card in the morning. At the end of an 8 hour shift, he leaves work without punching his time card. He comes back after getting dinner to punch his card, thus getting an extra 2 hours of “overtime.” The city pays the wage according to the cards for several months until catching the employee in the act. 

Example. A defendant goes to a store to purchase a $20 item with his $20 gift card. Once the purchase is complete, the cashier gives the card back to the defendant telling him that there is a balance of $180 on the card. The defendant realizes that there has been a glitch. The defendant goes into the store next hour to purchase a $180 TV with the card, hoping that the system glitch has not been fixed.  

Defenses. The defendant did not know that the information he/she was telling the victim was false.

Theft by Trick

The defendant causes or procures others to report falsely of his or her wealth or mercantile character and by thus imposing upon any person, obtains credit and thereby fraudulently gets or obtains possession of money, or property or obtains the labor or service of another. The prosecutor needs to prove 1. you obtained possession of someone else’s property, 2. the property owner consented to your possession because of fraud or deceit, 3. the defendant intended to steal the property (deprive permanently or for significant time of enjoyment of property), and the property owner did not intent to transfer ownership/title. 

Example. A defendant asks a person walking by if he can borrow his cellphone to call 911 to report an accident. The defendant actually wants to steal the phone and run away with it. If the defendant accomplishes his intentions, he/she will be guilty of larceny by trick.   

Grand Theft vs. Petty Theft

Penal Code 487 differentiates and defines grand theft and petty theft. The classification is determined by the present market value of the property and the nature of the property. Taking of firearms, farm animals, automobile or property taken from the person are always charged as grand theft. In all other cases, the present market value governs. Property valued under $950 is charged as petty theft, and property over $950 is grand theft. 

Punishment

Grand theft is considered a “wobbler” in California, meaning that it can be charged as a felony or misdemeanor depending on the fact of the case. Petty theft is punished by six months in county jail and a maximum fine of $1,000. Misdemeanor grand theft is punished by up to a year in county jail and a maximum fine of $1,000. Felony grand theft is punished by 16 months, two or three years in county jail and maximum fine of $10,000. 

Defenses

Aside from defenses described under each particular theft crime, there are number of defenses that relate to all theft crimes. Theft crimes are specific intent crimes, meaning that the defendant has to commit the physical act with a particular mental belief.

Ownership. If the defendant believes that the property is his/her, then he/she cannot be convicted of theft crimes. This is true even if the belief is unreasonable and mistaken. 

Note, the the victim does NOT have to be a true owner of the property. He/she is protected under the statute even if he/she is a mere possessor. Additionally, there is no requirement that the defendant benefits from the property.

Related Pages:

auto-theft

If you have been charged with a theft crime, call

619-357-6677

We can help. 

lawstachesticker_vectorized

logoDelicino & Vialtsin, LLP answer general legal questions emailed to us on this blog. Feel free to send us YOUR question by email. Please do not email us confidential or time sensitive information, but call 619-357-6677 The answer suggested here is for general information ONLY and not to be construed as a legal advice. Further, the Q & A does not establish an attorney-client relationship with Delicino & Vialtsin, LLP.  Google+